{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Forumul Judec\u0103torilor","provider_url":"http:\/\/www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro","author_name":"Redac\u0163ia RFJ","author_url":"http:\/\/www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro\/index.php\/archives\/author\/admin","title":"Procedura disciplinar\u0103 derulat\u0103 \u00eempotriva pre\u0219edintelui Cur\u021bii Supreme a Republicii Slovacia. \u00cenc\u0103lcarea dreptului la judecarea cauzei de o instan\u0163\u0103 impar\u0163ial\u0103. Motivul invocat de Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103, \u015fi anume nevoia de a-\u015fi men\u0163ine competen\u0163a de solu\u021bionare a cauzei, nu poate justifica participarea a doi judec\u0103tori ale c\u0103ror cereri de recuzare au fost admise \u00een procedurile anterioare derulate \u00eempotriva reclamantului, pentru lips\u0103 de impar\u0163ialitate","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro\/index.php\/archives\/2262\">Procedura disciplinar\u0103 derulat\u0103 \u00eempotriva pre\u0219edintelui Cur\u021bii Supreme a Republicii Slovacia. \u00cenc\u0103lcarea dreptului la judecarea cauzei de o instan\u0163\u0103 impar\u0163ial\u0103. Motivul invocat de Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103, \u015fi anume nevoia de a-\u015fi men\u0163ine competen\u0163a de solu\u021bionare a cauzei, nu poate justifica participarea a doi judec\u0103tori ale c\u0103ror cereri de recuzare au fost admise \u00een procedurile anterioare derulate \u00eempotriva reclamantului, pentru lips\u0103 de impar\u0163ialitate<\/a><\/blockquote>\n<script type='text\/javascript'>\n<!--\/\/--><![CDATA[\/\/><!--\n\t\t!function(d,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,n=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(d.addEventListener)e=!0;if(d.wp=d.wp||{},!d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage)if(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(t)if(t.secret||t.message||t.value)if(!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var r,i,a,s=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),c=0;c<n.length;c++)n[c].style.display=\"none\";for(c=0;c<s.length;c++)if(r=s[c],e.source===r.contentWindow){if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(a=parseInt(t.value,10)))a=1e3;else if(~~a<200)a=200;r.height=a}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(i=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),i.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,o.test(a.protocol))if(a.host===i.host)if(l.activeElement===r)d.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),d.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(!n){n=!0;for(var e,t,r=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),i=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),a=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),s=0;s<a.length;s++){if(!(e=a[s]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))t=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t);if(r||i)(t=e.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),e.parentNode.replaceChild(t,e)}}}}(window,document);\n\/\/--><!]]>\n<\/script><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"http:\/\/www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro\/index.php\/archives\/2262\/embed\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8222;Procedura disciplinar\u0103 derulat\u0103 \u00eempotriva pre\u0219edintelui Cur\u021bii Supreme a Republicii Slovacia. \u00cenc\u0103lcarea dreptului la judecarea cauzei de o instan\u0163\u0103 impar\u0163ial\u0103. Motivul invocat de Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103, \u015fi anume nevoia de a-\u015fi men\u0163ine competen\u0163a de solu\u021bionare a cauzei, nu poate justifica participarea a doi judec\u0103tori ale c\u0103ror cereri de recuzare au fost admise \u00een procedurile anterioare derulate \u00eempotriva reclamantului, pentru lips\u0103 de impar\u0163ialitate&#8221; &#8211; Forumul Judec\u0103torilor\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe>"}