{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Forumul Judec\u0103torilor","provider_url":"http:\/\/www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro","author_name":"Redac\u0163ia RFJ","author_url":"http:\/\/www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro\/index.php\/archives\/author\/admin","title":"Dat fiind num\u01cerul limitat de judec\u01cetori \u020bn func\u0163ie la Curtea Suprem\u0103 de Justi\u021bie din Georgia, de multe ori este inevitabil ca aceia\u0219i judec\u01cetori s\u01ce fie implica\u0163i \u020bn examinarea unei pl\u00e2ngeri asupra c\u01cereia deja \u0219i-au exprimat o opinie \u020bntr-un ansamblu anterior de ac\u0163iuni similare. Pe cale de consecin\u0163\u01ce, faptul c\u01ce un judec\u01cetor a fost implicat \u020bn ambele litigii privind pensia reclamantei, similare, dar f\u01cer\u01ce leg\u01cetur\u01ce \u020bntre ele - \u020bn cel dint\u00e2i caz exprim\u00e2nd o pozi\u0163ie minoritar\u01ce, iar \u020bn cel de-al doilea f\u01cec\u00e2nd parte din decizia majoritar\u01ce a completului \u2013 nu justific\u01ce argumentul c\u01ce impar\u0163ialitatea judec\u01cetorului ar fi fost afectat\u01ce \u020bn cea de-a doua cauz\u01ce","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro\/index.php\/archives\/2285\">Dat fiind num\u01cerul limitat de judec\u01cetori \u020bn func\u0163ie la Curtea Suprem\u0103 de Justi\u021bie din Georgia, de multe ori este inevitabil ca aceia\u0219i judec\u01cetori s\u01ce fie implica\u0163i \u020bn examinarea unei pl\u00e2ngeri asupra c\u01cereia deja \u0219i-au exprimat o opinie \u020bntr-un ansamblu anterior de ac\u0163iuni similare. Pe cale de consecin\u0163\u01ce, faptul c\u01ce un judec\u01cetor a fost implicat \u020bn ambele litigii privind pensia reclamantei, similare, dar f\u01cer\u01ce leg\u01cetur\u01ce \u020bntre ele &#8211; \u020bn cel dint\u00e2i caz exprim\u00e2nd o pozi\u0163ie minoritar\u01ce, iar \u020bn cel de-al doilea f\u01cec\u00e2nd parte din decizia majoritar\u01ce a completului \u2013 nu justific\u01ce argumentul c\u01ce impar\u0163ialitatea judec\u01cetorului ar fi fost afectat\u01ce \u020bn cea de-a doua cauz\u01ce<\/a><\/blockquote>\n<script type='text\/javascript'>\n<!--\/\/--><![CDATA[\/\/><!--\n\t\t!function(d,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,n=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(d.addEventListener)e=!0;if(d.wp=d.wp||{},!d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage)if(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(t)if(t.secret||t.message||t.value)if(!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var r,i,a,s=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),c=0;c<n.length;c++)n[c].style.display=\"none\";for(c=0;c<s.length;c++)if(r=s[c],e.source===r.contentWindow){if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(a=parseInt(t.value,10)))a=1e3;else if(~~a<200)a=200;r.height=a}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(i=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),i.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,o.test(a.protocol))if(a.host===i.host)if(l.activeElement===r)d.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),d.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(!n){n=!0;for(var e,t,r=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),i=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),a=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),s=0;s<a.length;s++){if(!(e=a[s]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))t=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t);if(r||i)(t=e.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),e.parentNode.replaceChild(t,e)}}}}(window,document);\n\/\/--><!]]>\n<\/script><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"http:\/\/www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro\/index.php\/archives\/2285\/embed\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8222;Dat fiind num\u01cerul limitat de judec\u01cetori \u020bn func\u0163ie la Curtea Suprem\u0103 de Justi\u021bie din Georgia, de multe ori este inevitabil ca aceia\u0219i judec\u01cetori s\u01ce fie implica\u0163i \u020bn examinarea unei pl\u00e2ngeri asupra c\u01cereia deja \u0219i-au exprimat o opinie \u020bntr-un ansamblu anterior de ac\u0163iuni similare. Pe cale de consecin\u0163\u01ce, faptul c\u01ce un judec\u01cetor a fost implicat \u020bn ambele litigii privind pensia reclamantei, similare, dar f\u01cer\u01ce leg\u01cetur\u01ce \u020bntre ele &#8211; \u020bn cel dint\u00e2i caz exprim\u00e2nd o pozi\u0163ie minoritar\u01ce, iar \u020bn cel de-al doilea f\u01cec\u00e2nd parte din decizia majoritar\u01ce a completului \u2013 nu justific\u01ce argumentul c\u01ce impar\u0163ialitatea judec\u01cetorului ar fi fost afectat\u01ce \u020bn cea de-a doua cauz\u01ce&#8221; &#8211; Forumul Judec\u0103torilor\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe>"}