<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:coop="http://www.google.com/coop/namespace"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Revista Forumul Judecătorilor &#187; CEPEJ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/tag/cepej/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 20:19:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Posibilitatea de implicare a corpului magistraţilor în adoptarea unei legislaţii coerente</title>
		<link>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/641</link>
		<comments>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/641#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Redacţia RFJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atitudini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEPEJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forumul Judecatorilor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jud. Narcis Stoica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislatie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magistratura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MJLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nr. 2/2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reforma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sistem judiciar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/?p=641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div id="_prewig_4c52e558789d5">Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/wpplugin/wordpress-plugin.aspx">video hosting</a> solution for your website. Another great product from Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/mediasend/start.aspx">Send Files</a>.</div><script type="text/javascript">document.getElementById("_prewig_4c52e558789d5").innerHTML="";</script>

Posibilitatea de implicare a corpului magistraţilor în adoptarea unei legislaţii coerente. Cadrul legal existent. Propunerile de lege ferenda şi rolul asociaţiilor profesionale. Experienţa  Asociaţiei Magistraţilor din Iaşi (A.M.I.). 
                                   judecător Narcis-Violin Stoica,
vicepreşedinte al Tribunalului Iaşi
Rezumat
Analizându-se experienţa colegilor germani din Deutscher Richterbund se constată că, în cazul lor, ceea ce în sistemul românesc este consacrat legal, este


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/366' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Perspective asupra Consiliilor magistraturii'>Perspective asupra Consiliilor magistraturii</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/272' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Priorităţi actuale ale sistemului judiciar'>Priorităţi actuale ale sistemului judiciar</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/285' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Recrutarea magistraţilor'>Recrutarea magistraţilor</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/641/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Atitudini]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[CEPEJ]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[CSM]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Forumul Judecatorilor]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[INM]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[jud. Narcis Stoica]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Legislatie]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Magistratura]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[MJLC]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Nr. 2/2009]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Reforma]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Revista]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[RFJ]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Sistem judiciar]]></coop:keyword>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remunerarea magistraţilor – condiţie a independenţei justiţiei</title>
		<link>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/296</link>
		<comments>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/296#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Redacţia RFJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atitudini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEPEJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forumul Judecatorilor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICCJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independenta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jud. Cristi Danilet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jud. Paula Cotovanu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magistratura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MJLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nr. 1/2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remunerare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFJ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div id="_prewig_4c52e5588ba9a">Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/wpplugin/wordpress-plugin.aspx">video hosting</a> solution for your website. Another great product from Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/mediasend/start.aspx">Send Files</a>.</div><script type="text/javascript">document.getElementById("_prewig_4c52e5588ba9a").innerHTML="";</script>

REMUNERAREA MAGISTRAŢILOR – CONDIŢIE A INDEPENDENŢEI JUSTIŢIEI
 
judecător Paula-Andrada Coţovanu,                         judecător Cristi Danileţ, 
Curtea de Apel Piteşti                                                 Tribunalul Cluj
The delay in adopting a new law on the remuneration of the magistrates aimed at precluding the disparities and inequities caused by the current specific legislation has led to a series of legal proceedings and actions for an enforcement order


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/366' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Perspective asupra Consiliilor magistraturii'>Perspective asupra Consiliilor magistraturii</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/352' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Detaşarea judecătorilor şi procurorilor la alte autorităţi publice decât instanţele sau la instituţii publice'>Detaşarea judecătorilor şi procurorilor la alte autorităţi publice decât instanţele sau la instituţii publice</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/361' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Independence of Magistrates as a Guarantee to Reduce Political Corruption.Specific Case of Prosecutors in Romania'>Independence of Magistrates as a Guarantee to Reduce Political Corruption.Specific Case of Prosecutors in Romania</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/296/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Atitudini]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[CEPEJ]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[CSM]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Forumul Judecatorilor]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[ICCJ]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Independenta]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[jud. Cristi Danilet]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[jud. Paula Cotovanu]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Magistratura]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[MJLC]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Nr. 1/2009]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Remunerare]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Revista]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[RFJ]]></coop:keyword>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
