• Home
• Redacţia
• Număr curent
• Numere anterioare
• Principii de publicare
• Comenzi
• Forum

Editorial “Magistratura română. Quo vadis?”

MAGISTRATURA ROMÂNĂ. QUO VADIS?
 judecător Dragoş Călin,
Curtea de Apel  Bucureşti
 
În magistratura română, ultimul an a fost atât de agitat cât nu au fost toţi ceilalţi nouăsprezece ani de firavă democraţie, scurşi din decembrie 1989.
Judecătorii şi procurorii s-au revoltat, în special din cauza posibilităţii scăderii remuneraţiilor magistraţilor, ce-i drept într-o situaţie extraordinară a României, pe care [...]

Conferinţa “Normarea muncii în instanţe. Necesitate, reglementare, consecinţe”

Revista Forumul Judecătorilor, Societatea de Ştiinţe Juridice, Institutul de Cercetări Juridice al Academiei Române şi Editura Universitară
 
vă adresează invitaţia de a participa la Conferinţa
 “Normarea muncii în instanţe. Necesitate, reglementare, consecinţe”
 Aula Institutului Naţional al Magistraturii,
Bucureşti, bd. Regina Elisabeta nr. 53, sector 5
- vineri, 29 ianuarie 2010, orele 15.00 -
 
Dezbaterea îşi propune realizarea unui schimb [...]

Posibilitatea de implicare a corpului magistraţilor în adoptarea unei legislaţii coerente

Posibilitatea de implicare a corpului magistraţilor în adoptarea unei legislaţii coerente. Cadrul legal existent. Propunerile de lege ferenda şi rolul asociaţiilor profesionale. Experienţa  Asociaţiei Magistraţilor din Iaşi (A.M.I.). 
                                   judecător Narcis-Violin Stoica,
vicepreşedinte al Tribunalului Iaşi
Rezumat
Analizându-se experienţa colegilor germani din Deutscher Richterbund se constată că, în cazul lor, ceea ce în sistemul românesc este consacrat legal, este [...]

Serviciul Independent de Protecţie şi Anticorupţie. O poveste despre justiţie şi servicii secrete

Serviciul Independent de Protecţie şi Anticorupţie.
O poveste despre justiţie şi servicii secrete
 
Judecător Dana Gîrbovan,
Curtea de Apel Cluj
Rezumat
Pentru o mai bună înţelegere a acestei poveşti – din nefericire, foarte asemănătoare cu realitatea -  studiul este împărţit în mai multe planuri: un scurt istoric al Serviciului Independent de Protecţie si Anticorupţie, cunoscut tuturor sub denumirea de [...]

Perspective asupra Consiliilor magistraturii

Each of the topics I have addressed would form a talk in itself and benefit from a much more detailed analysis. Time does not permit. However, in my view, when an analysis of the tasks which must be performed to maintain the independence of the judicial branch of the state is carried out, I think the inevitable conclusion is that a Council for the Judiciary is needed. It must fulfil a central role, even though some of the tasks may be carried out by others. There is no real alternative. The judicial branch of the state needs a central institution not only to discharge the tasks I have enumerated itself (or to ensure that others discharge them independently), but also to manage the relationship with the legislature and the executive and to take overall responsibility for the proper functioning of the judicial branch of the state and in particular the timely and impartial delivery of justice at the lowest cost consistent with the interests of justice. A judiciary that does not have the means of ensuring this will find that others are quite happy to do it for them. Without proper and responsible arrangements for governance this may well happen.

Not only will a Council fulfil the central role I have described, but it should also provide leadership and central representation for the judiciary and balance the relationships with the Judges Associations and the judicial hierarchy. Finally may I add a word about the composition of a Council for the Judiciary. If a Council is to fulfil the role in the governance of the judiciary which I have outlined, its composition is of central importance. There is great diversity across Europe. In England and Wales we do not have direct elections to the Council. Each level of the judiciary has its own Association where elections are held and the officers of those Associations (or their delegates) serve on our Council; our Lord Chief Justice is our chairman. We have found that selecting the representation by means of using the Associations means that the Associations work closely with the Council and understand and generally support what it does. There is generally no tension between the Associations and the Council; nor between the Council and the judicial hierarchy (the senior or presiding judges at courts or groups of courts or in regions). That is because the Lord Chief Justice is both President of all the Courts of England and Wales and Chairman of the Council.

The Evolution of the Judicial System in Romania

THE EVOLUTION OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN ROMANIA DURING THE PAST 60 YEARS 
     Horaţius Dumbravă,                                          Dragoş Călin,
     Judge, Court of Appeal Mures                      Judge, Court of Appeal Bucharest
 
The reform of the judicial system is very difficult taking into account the judges from the communist period are mentained, whose vision of the rule of law [...]

Independence of Magistrates as a Guarantee to Reduce Political Corruption.Specific Case of Prosecutors in Romania

INDEPENDENCE OF MAGISTRATES AS A GUARANTEE TO REDUCE POLITICAL CORRUPTION. SPECIFIC CASE OF PROSECUTORS IN ROMANIA
Marius Bulancea,
Prosecutor, Office attached to the
High Court of Cassation and Justice 
  
Successfully prosecuting high profile cases of political corruption is an exceptional challenge for any law enforcement agency.
The fundamental democratic principle according to which everyone is equal under the [...]

Detaşarea judecătorilor şi procurorilor la alte autorităţi publice decât instanţele sau la instituţii publice

DETAŞAREA JUDECĂTORILOR ŞI PROCURORILOR
LA ALTE AUTORITĂŢI PUBLICE DECÂT INSTANŢELE SAU LA INSTITUŢII PUBLICE
 
 judecător Horaţius Dumbravă,                                              judecător Dragoş Călin,
Curtea de Apel Târgu Mureş                                                 Curtea de Apel Bucureşti
 
The secondments of the judges and of the prosecutors to other public authorities than the Courts, or to the public institutions, in any public service, public offices as well, impair [...]

Remunerarea magistraţilor – condiţie a independenţei justiţiei

REMUNERAREA MAGISTRAŢILOR – CONDIŢIE A INDEPENDENŢEI JUSTIŢIEI
 
judecător Paula-Andrada Coţovanu,                         judecător Cristi Danileţ, 
Curtea de Apel Piteşti                                                 Tribunalul Cluj
The delay in adopting a new law on the remuneration of the magistrates aimed at precluding the disparities and inequities caused by the current specific legislation has led to a series of legal proceedings and actions for an enforcement order [...]

Recrutarea magistraţilor

RECRUTAREA MAGISTRAŢILOR – GARANŢIE PRINCIPALĂ A INDEPENDENŢEI ACESTORA
  
judecător Roxana Maria Lăcătuşu,                                   judecător  Angelica Cruceanu, 
Judecătoria Sectorului 4 Bucureşti                                   Judecătoria Focşani
   
The training of a body of magistrates responding to the actual and optimum profil of the magistrate is a desideratum and its achievement is necessary in order to fulfill the actual needs of the system.
The valuation of the [...]

Priorităţi actuale ale sistemului judiciar

PRIORITĂŢI ACTUALE ALE SISTEMULUI JUDICIAR
ÎN CONTEXTUL STRATEGIEI DE REFORMĂ
  
judecător Ciprian Coadă,
vicepreşedinte Tribunalul Constanţa
  
 
The rule of law is based upon the judiciary as a central element of the social stability, the consequence being that the equilibrium between the social structures and the bodies of the judiciary is essential.
The judiciary systems have to adapt to the [...]

Theme Copyright Revista Forumul Judecătorilor