• Home
• Redacţia
• Număr curent
• Numere anterioare
• Principii de publicare
• Comenzi
• Forum

Conferinţa “Normarea muncii în instanţe. Necesitate, reglementare, consecinţe”

Revista Forumul Judecătorilor, Societatea de Ştiinţe Juridice, Institutul de Cercetări Juridice al Academiei Române şi Editura Universitară
 
vă adresează invitaţia de a participa la Conferinţa
 “Normarea muncii în instanţe. Necesitate, reglementare, consecinţe”
 Aula Institutului Naţional al Magistraturii,
Bucureşti, bd. Regina Elisabeta nr. 53, sector 5
- vineri, 29 ianuarie 2010, orele 15.00 -
 
Dezbaterea îşi propune realizarea unui schimb [...]

Posibilitatea de implicare a corpului magistraţilor în adoptarea unei legislaţii coerente

Posibilitatea de implicare a corpului magistraţilor în adoptarea unei legislaţii coerente. Cadrul legal existent. Propunerile de lege ferenda şi rolul asociaţiilor profesionale. Experienţa  Asociaţiei Magistraţilor din Iaşi (A.M.I.). 
                                   judecător Narcis-Violin Stoica,
vicepreşedinte al Tribunalului Iaşi
Rezumat
Analizându-se experienţa colegilor germani din Deutscher Richterbund se constată că, în cazul lor, ceea ce în sistemul românesc este consacrat legal, este [...]

Conferinţa ”Libertatea de exprimare a magistraţilor. Limite şi vulnerabilităţi”. Scurtă relatare

Conferinţa ”Libertatea de exprimare a magistraţilor. Limite şi vulnerabilităţi”. Scurtă relatare 
 
Revista Forumul judecătorilor, Societatea de Studii Juridice, Institutul de Cercetări Juridice al Academiei Române şi Editura Universitară, cu sprijinul Institutului Naţional al Magistraturii au organizat, la data de 30 noiembrie 2009, Conferinţa ”Libertatea de exprimare a magistraţilor. Limite şi vulnerabilităţi”.
Dezbaterea a realizat un schimb de [...]

Perspective asupra Consiliilor magistraturii

Each of the topics I have addressed would form a talk in itself and benefit from a much more detailed analysis. Time does not permit. However, in my view, when an analysis of the tasks which must be performed to maintain the independence of the judicial branch of the state is carried out, I think the inevitable conclusion is that a Council for the Judiciary is needed. It must fulfil a central role, even though some of the tasks may be carried out by others. There is no real alternative. The judicial branch of the state needs a central institution not only to discharge the tasks I have enumerated itself (or to ensure that others discharge them independently), but also to manage the relationship with the legislature and the executive and to take overall responsibility for the proper functioning of the judicial branch of the state and in particular the timely and impartial delivery of justice at the lowest cost consistent with the interests of justice. A judiciary that does not have the means of ensuring this will find that others are quite happy to do it for them. Without proper and responsible arrangements for governance this may well happen.

Not only will a Council fulfil the central role I have described, but it should also provide leadership and central representation for the judiciary and balance the relationships with the Judges Associations and the judicial hierarchy. Finally may I add a word about the composition of a Council for the Judiciary. If a Council is to fulfil the role in the governance of the judiciary which I have outlined, its composition is of central importance. There is great diversity across Europe. In England and Wales we do not have direct elections to the Council. Each level of the judiciary has its own Association where elections are held and the officers of those Associations (or their delegates) serve on our Council; our Lord Chief Justice is our chairman. We have found that selecting the representation by means of using the Associations means that the Associations work closely with the Council and understand and generally support what it does. There is generally no tension between the Associations and the Council; nor between the Council and the judicial hierarchy (the senior or presiding judges at courts or groups of courts or in regions). That is because the Lord Chief Justice is both President of all the Courts of England and Wales and Chairman of the Council.

Recrutarea magistraţilor

RECRUTAREA MAGISTRAŢILOR – GARANŢIE PRINCIPALĂ A INDEPENDENŢEI ACESTORA
  
judecător Roxana Maria Lăcătuşu,                                   judecător  Angelica Cruceanu, 
Judecătoria Sectorului 4 Bucureşti                                   Judecătoria Focşani
   
The training of a body of magistrates responding to the actual and optimum profil of the magistrate is a desideratum and its achievement is necessary in order to fulfill the actual needs of the system.
The valuation of the [...]

Priorităţi actuale ale sistemului judiciar

PRIORITĂŢI ACTUALE ALE SISTEMULUI JUDICIAR
ÎN CONTEXTUL STRATEGIEI DE REFORMĂ
  
judecător Ciprian Coadă,
vicepreşedinte Tribunalul Constanţa
  
 
The rule of law is based upon the judiciary as a central element of the social stability, the consequence being that the equilibrium between the social structures and the bodies of the judiciary is essential.
The judiciary systems have to adapt to the [...]

Theme Copyright Revista Forumul Judecătorilor