Posibilitatea de implicare a corpului magistraţilor în adoptarea unei legislaţii coerente
Posibilitatea de implicare a corpului magistraţilor în adoptarea unei legislaţii coerente. Cadrul legal existent. Propunerile de lege ferenda şi rolul asociaţiilor profesionale. Experienţa Asociaţiei Magistraţilor din Iaşi (A.M.I.).
judecător Narcis-Violin Stoica,
vicepreşedinte al Tribunalului Iaşi
Rezumat
Analizându-se experienţa colegilor germani din Deutscher Richterbund se constată că, în cazul lor, ceea ce în sistemul românesc este consacrat legal, este [...]
Discuţii asupra constituţionalităţii art. 55 alin. 1 şi 2 din Legea nr. 304/2004
The provisions of the Article 55(1) and (2) of the Law No. 304/2004 concerning the organisation of judiciary, republished, run counter to the Constitutional framework of Article 21(3) and also to the more favourable provisions of the Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights, directly applicable according to Articles 11 and 20(2) of the Constitution of Romania as far as they are construed as the mandatory opinion expressed by the judiciary assistants may not be debated by the litigants as the Court has not reached a decision.
The same provisions run counter the Constitutional framework of Articles 1(4) and 124(3) and also to more favourable provisions of the Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights, as far as they are construes as the judiciary assistants may take part in the deliberations, having a secret nature deemed to guarantee the independence and impartiality of the judges, and that those are obliged to sign the judgments.
Dreptul cetăţenilor străini la reconstituirea dreptului de proprietate asupra terenurilor în calitate de moştenitori ai autorului lor
We assess that the foreign citizens may obtain the property of the lands by means of the legal reconstitution, in their capacity of successors of the former owner, immaterial of the date of his/her death, providing the reconstitution is regulated by the Constitution (which means that the procedure was pending at the date of 29.10.2003 or the procedure would be initiate after that moment, under the Law No. 247/2005).
Perspective asupra Consiliilor magistraturii
Each of the topics I have addressed would form a talk in itself and benefit from a much more detailed analysis. Time does not permit. However, in my view, when an analysis of the tasks which must be performed to maintain the independence of the judicial branch of the state is carried out, I think the inevitable conclusion is that a Council for the Judiciary is needed. It must fulfil a central role, even though some of the tasks may be carried out by others. There is no real alternative. The judicial branch of the state needs a central institution not only to discharge the tasks I have enumerated itself (or to ensure that others discharge them independently), but also to manage the relationship with the legislature and the executive and to take overall responsibility for the proper functioning of the judicial branch of the state and in particular the timely and impartial delivery of justice at the lowest cost consistent with the interests of justice. A judiciary that does not have the means of ensuring this will find that others are quite happy to do it for them. Without proper and responsible arrangements for governance this may well happen.
Not only will a Council fulfil the central role I have described, but it should also provide leadership and central representation for the judiciary and balance the relationships with the Judges Associations and the judicial hierarchy. Finally may I add a word about the composition of a Council for the Judiciary. If a Council is to fulfil the role in the governance of the judiciary which I have outlined, its composition is of central importance. There is great diversity across Europe. In England and Wales we do not have direct elections to the Council. Each level of the judiciary has its own Association where elections are held and the officers of those Associations (or their delegates) serve on our Council; our Lord Chief Justice is our chairman. We have found that selecting the representation by means of using the Associations means that the Associations work closely with the Council and understand and generally support what it does. There is generally no tension between the Associations and the Council; nor between the Council and the judicial hierarchy (the senior or presiding judges at courts or groups of courts or in regions). That is because the Lord Chief Justice is both President of all the Courts of England and Wales and Chairman of the Council.
Discriminarea generată de jurisprudenţa Î.C.C.J. în materia gradului profesional al procurorilor D.N.A. şi D.I.I.C.O.T.
DISCRIMINAREA GENERATĂ DE JURISPRUDENŢA Î.C.C.J. ÎN MATERIA GRADULUI PROFESIONAL AL PROCURORILOR DIRECŢIEI NAŢIONALE ANTICORUPŢIE ŞI DIRECŢIEI DE INVESTIGARE A INFRACŢIUNILOR DE CRIMINALITATE ORGANIZATĂ ŞI TERORISM
judecător Dragoş Călin, judecător Sergiu-Leon Rus,
Curtea de Apel Bucureşti Curtea de Apel Cluj
An unprecedented and absolutely impredictible crack in the status of the magistrates, until that moment fairly well [...]
Practica neunitară în interpretarea dispoziţiilor legale privind remunerarea magistraţilor stagiari
PRACTICA NEUNITARĂ ÎN INTERPRETAREA DISPOZIŢIILOR LEGALE PRIVIND REMUNERAREA MAGISTRAŢILOR STAGIARI
judecător Roxana Maria Lăcătuşu, judecător Ionuţ Militaru,
Judecătoria Sectorului 4 Bucureşti Judecătoria Sectorului 6 Bucureşti
The purpose of the Legislator, according to the principle of nondiscrimination, was that of taking into account the seniority as the single criterion in order to assess the remuneration due to [...]
Discriminări determinate de diferenţe de rasă şi origine etnică
DISCRIMINĂRI DETERMINATE DE DIFERENŢE DE RASĂ ŞI ORIGINE ETNICĂ
judecător Laura Curcio,
Curtea de Apel pentru litigii de muncă
Milano, Italia
Nationality is not included as possible factor of discrimination nor by the n. 43/2000 Directive Union either by the Italian decree law n. 268/1998.This exclusion seems debatable , above all because article 12 of CE Treaty [...]
Recrutarea magistraţilor
RECRUTAREA MAGISTRAŢILOR – GARANŢIE PRINCIPALĂ A INDEPENDENŢEI ACESTORA
judecător Roxana Maria Lăcătuşu, judecător Angelica Cruceanu,
Judecătoria Sectorului 4 Bucureşti Judecătoria Focşani
The training of a body of magistrates responding to the actual and optimum profil of the magistrate is a desideratum and its achievement is necessary in order to fulfill the actual needs of the system.
The valuation of the [...]
Priorităţi actuale ale sistemului judiciar
PRIORITĂŢI ACTUALE ALE SISTEMULUI JUDICIAR
ÎN CONTEXTUL STRATEGIEI DE REFORMĂ
judecător Ciprian Coadă,
vicepreşedinte Tribunalul Constanţa
The rule of law is based upon the judiciary as a central element of the social stability, the consequence being that the equilibrium between the social structures and the bodies of the judiciary is essential.
The judiciary systems have to adapt to the [...]
Scurte observaţii privind impactul codurilor de procedură asupra sistemului judiciar
SCURTE OBSERVAŢII PRIVIND IMPACTUL CODURILOR DE PROCEDURĂ ASUPRA SISTEMULUI JUDICIAR
judecător Lavinia Lefterache,
Curtea de Apel Bucureşti
Analiza impactului modificării numărului de membri ai completului de judecată la fond asupra sistemului judiciar are ca punct de plecare resursele umane disponibile, precum şi numărul de cauze înregistrate pe rolul instanţelor. Diversificarea funcţiilor judiciare propusă de proiectele de coduri de [...]
