Editorial “Criza din justiţia română a anului 2009. Demnitatea magistraţilor”
Cincopa video hosting solution for your website. Another great product from Cincopa Send Files.
CRIZA DIN JUSTIŢIA ROMÂNĂ A ANULUI 2009.
DEMNITATEA MAGISTRAŢILOR
judecător Roxana Maria Lăcătuşu,
Judecătoria Sectorului 4 Bucureşti
În contextul unor dezechilibre economice, financiare şi politice, acutizate pe parcursul anului 2009, în toate domeniile de activitate, magistraţii români au dorit în acelaşi an să realizeze o abordare diferită a problemelor în care se zbat. Discuţiile din interiorul sistemului au [...]
Perspective asupra Consiliilor magistraturii
Each of the topics I have addressed would form a talk in itself and benefit from a much more detailed analysis. Time does not permit. However, in my view, when an analysis of the tasks which must be performed to maintain the independence of the judicial branch of the state is carried out, I think the inevitable conclusion is that a Council for the Judiciary is needed. It must fulfil a central role, even though some of the tasks may be carried out by others. There is no real alternative. The judicial branch of the state needs a central institution not only to discharge the tasks I have enumerated itself (or to ensure that others discharge them independently), but also to manage the relationship with the legislature and the executive and to take overall responsibility for the proper functioning of the judicial branch of the state and in particular the timely and impartial delivery of justice at the lowest cost consistent with the interests of justice. A judiciary that does not have the means of ensuring this will find that others are quite happy to do it for them. Without proper and responsible arrangements for governance this may well happen.
Not only will a Council fulfil the central role I have described, but it should also provide leadership and central representation for the judiciary and balance the relationships with the Judges Associations and the judicial hierarchy. Finally may I add a word about the composition of a Council for the Judiciary. If a Council is to fulfil the role in the governance of the judiciary which I have outlined, its composition is of central importance. There is great diversity across Europe. In England and Wales we do not have direct elections to the Council. Each level of the judiciary has its own Association where elections are held and the officers of those Associations (or their delegates) serve on our Council; our Lord Chief Justice is our chairman. We have found that selecting the representation by means of using the Associations means that the Associations work closely with the Council and understand and generally support what it does. There is generally no tension between the Associations and the Council; nor between the Council and the judicial hierarchy (the senior or presiding judges at courts or groups of courts or in regions). That is because the Lord Chief Justice is both President of all the Courts of England and Wales and Chairman of the Council.
Discriminarea generată de jurisprudenţa Î.C.C.J. în materia gradului profesional al procurorilor D.N.A. şi D.I.I.C.O.T.
Cincopa video hosting solution for your website. Another great product from Cincopa Send Files.
DISCRIMINAREA GENERATĂ DE JURISPRUDENŢA Î.C.C.J. ÎN MATERIA GRADULUI PROFESIONAL AL PROCURORILOR DIRECŢIEI NAŢIONALE ANTICORUPŢIE ŞI DIRECŢIEI DE INVESTIGARE A INFRACŢIUNILOR DE CRIMINALITATE ORGANIZATĂ ŞI TERORISM
judecător Dragoş Călin, judecător Sergiu-Leon Rus,
Curtea de Apel Bucureşti Curtea de Apel Cluj
An unprecedented and absolutely impredictible crack in the status of the magistrates, until that moment fairly well [...]
Practica neunitară în interpretarea dispoziţiilor legale privind remunerarea magistraţilor stagiari
Cincopa video hosting solution for your website. Another great product from Cincopa Send Files.
PRACTICA NEUNITARĂ ÎN INTERPRETAREA DISPOZIŢIILOR LEGALE PRIVIND REMUNERAREA MAGISTRAŢILOR STAGIARI
judecător Roxana Maria Lăcătuşu, judecător Ionuţ Militaru,
Judecătoria Sectorului 4 Bucureşti Judecătoria Sectorului 6 Bucureşti
The purpose of the Legislator, according to the principle of nondiscrimination, was that of taking into account the seniority as the single criterion in order to assess the remuneration due to [...]
Remunerarea magistraţilor – condiţie a independenţei justiţiei
Cincopa video hosting solution for your website. Another great product from Cincopa Send Files.
REMUNERAREA MAGISTRAŢILOR – CONDIŢIE A INDEPENDENŢEI JUSTIŢIEI
judecător Paula-Andrada Coţovanu, judecător Cristi Danileţ,
Curtea de Apel Piteşti Tribunalul Cluj
The delay in adopting a new law on the remuneration of the magistrates aimed at precluding the disparities and inequities caused by the current specific legislation has led to a series of legal proceedings and actions for an enforcement order [...]
