<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:coop="http://www.google.com/coop/namespace"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Revista Forumul Judecătorilor &#187; Remunerare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/tag/remunerare/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 20:19:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Editorial &#8220;Criza din justiţia română a anului 2009. Demnitatea magistraţilor&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/600</link>
		<comments>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/600#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Redacţia RFJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editoriale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forumul Judecatorilor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impartialitate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independenta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jud. Roxana Lacatusu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertate de exprimare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magistratura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nr. 3/2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reforma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remunerare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sistem judiciar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/?p=600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div id="_prewig_4c52e5bedc48d">Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/wpplugin/wordpress-plugin.aspx">video hosting</a> solution for your website. Another great product from Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/mediasend/start.aspx">Send Files</a>.</div><script type="text/javascript">document.getElementById("_prewig_4c52e5bedc48d").innerHTML="";</script>
<div id="_prewig_4c52e5bee593a">Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/wpplugin/wordpress-plugin.aspx">video hosting</a> solution for your website. Another great product from Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/mediasend/start.aspx">Send Files</a>.</div><script type="text/javascript">document.getElementById("_prewig_4c52e5bee593a").innerHTML="";</script>

CRIZA DIN JUSTIŢIA ROMÂNĂ A ANULUI 2009. 
DEMNITATEA MAGISTRAŢILOR
 
 judecător Roxana Maria Lăcătuşu,
Judecătoria Sectorului 4 Bucureşti 
În contextul unor dezechilibre economice, financiare şi politice, acutizate pe parcursul anului 2009, în toate domeniile de activitate, magistraţii români au dorit în acelaşi an să realizeze o abordare diferită a problemelor în care se zbat. Discuţiile din interiorul sistemului au


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/430' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Интервью Ольга Кудешкина &#8211; свобода выражения мнений'>Интервью Ольга Кудешкина &#8211; свобода выражения мнений</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/560' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Editorial &#8220;Magistratura română. Quo vadis?&#8221;'>Editorial &#8220;Magistratura română. Quo vadis?&#8221;</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/608' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Conferinţa ”Libertatea de exprimare a magistraţilor. Limite şi vulnerabilităţi”. Scurtă relatare'>Conferinţa ”Libertatea de exprimare a magistraţilor. Limite şi vulnerabilităţi”. Scurtă relatare</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/600/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Editoriale]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Editorial]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Forumul Judecatorilor]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Impartialitate]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Independenta]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[jud. Roxana Lacatusu]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Libertate de exprimare]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Magistratura]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Nr. 3/2009]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Reforma]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Remunerare]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Revista]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[RFJ]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Sistem judiciar]]></coop:keyword>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perspective asupra Consiliilor magistraturii</title>
		<link>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/366</link>
		<comments>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/366#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Redacţia RFJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atitudini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCJE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detasare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EJTN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forumul Judecatorilor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impartialitate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independenta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislatie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magistratura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MJLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nr. 1/2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promovare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recrutare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reforma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remunerare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sistem judiciar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div id="_prewig_4c52e5bf1ce0e">Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/wpplugin/wordpress-plugin.aspx">video hosting</a> solution for your website. Another great product from Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/mediasend/start.aspx">Send Files</a>.</div><script type="text/javascript">document.getElementById("_prewig_4c52e5bf1ce0e").innerHTML="";</script>
Each of the topics I have addressed would form a talk in itself and benefit from a much more detailed analysis. Time does not permit. However, in my view, when an analysis of the tasks which must be performed to maintain the independence of the judicial branch of the state is carried out, I think


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/285' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Recrutarea magistraţilor'>Recrutarea magistraţilor</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/272' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Priorităţi actuale ale sistemului judiciar'>Priorităţi actuale ale sistemului judiciar</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/352' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Detaşarea judecătorilor şi procurorilor la alte autorităţi publice decât instanţele sau la instituţii publice'>Detaşarea judecătorilor şi procurorilor la alte autorităţi publice decât instanţele sau la instituţii publice</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/366/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Atitudini]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[CCJE]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[CSM]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Detasare]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[EJTN]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Forumul Judecatorilor]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Impartialitate]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Independenta]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[INM]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Legislatie]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Magistratura]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[MJLC]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Nr. 1/2009]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Promovare]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Recrutare]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Reforma]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Remunerare]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Revista]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[RFJ]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Sistem judiciar]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Transfer]]></coop:keyword>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discriminarea generată de jurisprudenţa Î.C.C.J. în materia gradului profesional al procurorilor D.N.A. şi D.I.I.C.O.T.</title>
		<link>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/356</link>
		<comments>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/356#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Redacţia RFJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atitudini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIICOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discriminare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forumul Judecatorilor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICCJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jud. Dragos Calin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jud. Sergiu Leon Rus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudenta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislatie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magistratura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nr. 1/2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promovare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recrutare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remunerare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sistem judiciar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div id="_prewig_4c52e5bf63b02">Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/wpplugin/wordpress-plugin.aspx">video hosting</a> solution for your website. Another great product from Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/mediasend/start.aspx">Send Files</a>.</div><script type="text/javascript">document.getElementById("_prewig_4c52e5bf63b02").innerHTML="";</script>
<div id="_prewig_4c52e5bf817b0">Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/wpplugin/wordpress-plugin.aspx">video hosting</a> solution for your website. Another great product from Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/mediasend/start.aspx">Send Files</a>.</div><script type="text/javascript">document.getElementById("_prewig_4c52e5bf817b0").innerHTML="";</script>

DISCRIMINAREA GENERATĂ DE JURISPRUDENŢA Î.C.C.J. ÎN MATERIA GRADULUI PROFESIONAL AL PROCURORILOR DIRECŢIEI NAŢIONALE ANTICORUPŢIE ŞI DIRECŢIEI DE INVESTIGARE A INFRACŢIUNILOR DE CRIMINALITATE ORGANIZATĂ ŞI TERORISM 


       judecător Dragoş Călin,                               judecător Sergiu-Leon Rus, 
       Curtea de Apel Bucureşti                            Curtea de Apel Cluj 
 An unprecedented and absolutely impredictible crack in the status of the magistrates, until that moment fairly well


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/272' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Priorităţi actuale ale sistemului judiciar'>Priorităţi actuale ale sistemului judiciar</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/354' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Practica neunitară în interpretarea dispoziţiilor legale privind remunerarea magistraţilor stagiari'>Practica neunitară în interpretarea dispoziţiilor legale privind remunerarea magistraţilor stagiari</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/366' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Perspective asupra Consiliilor magistraturii'>Perspective asupra Consiliilor magistraturii</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/356/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Atitudini]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[DIICOT]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Discriminare]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[DNA]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Forumul Judecatorilor]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[ICCJ]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[jud. Dragos Calin]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[jud. Sergiu Leon Rus]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Jurisprudenta]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Legislatie]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Magistratura]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Nr. 1/2009]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Promovare]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Recrutare]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Remunerare]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Revista]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[RFJ]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Sistem judiciar]]></coop:keyword>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Practica neunitară în interpretarea dispoziţiilor legale privind remunerarea magistraţilor stagiari</title>
		<link>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/354</link>
		<comments>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/354#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Redacţia RFJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atitudini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEDO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discriminare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forumul Judecatorilor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jud. Ionut Militaru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jud. Roxana Lacatusu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudenta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislatie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magistratura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MJLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nr. 1/2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remunerare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sistem judiciar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div id="_prewig_4c52e5bfd5b4b">Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/wpplugin/wordpress-plugin.aspx">video hosting</a> solution for your website. Another great product from Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/mediasend/start.aspx">Send Files</a>.</div><script type="text/javascript">document.getElementById("_prewig_4c52e5bfd5b4b").innerHTML="";</script>
<div id="_prewig_4c52e5c02685b">Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/wpplugin/wordpress-plugin.aspx">video hosting</a> solution for your website. Another great product from Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/mediasend/start.aspx">Send Files</a>.</div><script type="text/javascript">document.getElementById("_prewig_4c52e5c02685b").innerHTML="";</script>

PRACTICA NEUNITARĂ ÎN INTERPRETAREA DISPOZIŢIILOR LEGALE PRIVIND REMUNERAREA MAGISTRAŢILOR STAGIARI 


        judecător Roxana Maria Lăcătuşu,                    judecător Ionuţ Militaru,
        Judecătoria Sectorului 4 Bucureşti                  Judecătoria Sectorului 6 Bucureşti
 
The purpose of the Legislator, according to the principle of nondiscrimination, was that of taking into account the seniority as the single criterion in order to assess the remuneration due to


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/356' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Discriminarea generată de jurisprudenţa Î.C.C.J. în materia gradului profesional al procurorilor D.N.A. şi D.I.I.C.O.T.'>Discriminarea generată de jurisprudenţa Î.C.C.J. în materia gradului profesional al procurorilor D.N.A. şi D.I.I.C.O.T.</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/366' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Perspective asupra Consiliilor magistraturii'>Perspective asupra Consiliilor magistraturii</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/285' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Recrutarea magistraţilor'>Recrutarea magistraţilor</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/354/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
			<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Atitudini]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[CEDO]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Discriminare]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Forumul Judecatorilor]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[jud. Ionut Militaru]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[jud. Roxana Lacatusu]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Jurisprudenta]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Legislatie]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Magistratura]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[MJLC]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Nr. 1/2009]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Remunerare]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Revista]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[RFJ]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Sistem judiciar]]></coop:keyword>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remunerarea magistraţilor – condiţie a independenţei justiţiei</title>
		<link>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/296</link>
		<comments>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/296#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Redacţia RFJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atitudini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEPEJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forumul Judecatorilor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICCJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independenta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jud. Cristi Danilet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jud. Paula Cotovanu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magistratura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MJLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nr. 1/2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remunerare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFJ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div id="_prewig_4c52e5c08c771">Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/wpplugin/wordpress-plugin.aspx">video hosting</a> solution for your website. Another great product from Cincopa <a href="http://www.cincopa.com/mediasend/start.aspx">Send Files</a>.</div><script type="text/javascript">document.getElementById("_prewig_4c52e5c08c771").innerHTML="";</script>

REMUNERAREA MAGISTRAŢILOR – CONDIŢIE A INDEPENDENŢEI JUSTIŢIEI
 
judecător Paula-Andrada Coţovanu,                         judecător Cristi Danileţ, 
Curtea de Apel Piteşti                                                 Tribunalul Cluj
The delay in adopting a new law on the remuneration of the magistrates aimed at precluding the disparities and inequities caused by the current specific legislation has led to a series of legal proceedings and actions for an enforcement order


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/366' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Perspective asupra Consiliilor magistraturii'>Perspective asupra Consiliilor magistraturii</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/352' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Detaşarea judecătorilor şi procurorilor la alte autorităţi publice decât instanţele sau la instituţii publice'>Detaşarea judecătorilor şi procurorilor la alte autorităţi publice decât instanţele sau la instituţii publice</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/361' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Independence of Magistrates as a Guarantee to Reduce Political Corruption.Specific Case of Prosecutors in Romania'>Independence of Magistrates as a Guarantee to Reduce Political Corruption.Specific Case of Prosecutors in Romania</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/revista/296/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Atitudini]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[CEPEJ]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[CSM]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Forumul Judecatorilor]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[ICCJ]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Independenta]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[jud. Cristi Danilet]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[jud. Paula Cotovanu]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Magistratura]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[MJLC]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Nr. 1/2009]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Remunerare]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[Revista]]></coop:keyword>
		<coop:keyword><![CDATA[RFJ]]></coop:keyword>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
