- Revista Forumul Judecătorilor
- Redacţia
- Număr curent
- Numere anterioare
- Lectură online
- Principii de publicare
- Comenzi
- Forum
- Asociaţia FJR
- Comunicate
- 10.05.2016 – Asociaţia „Forumul Judecătorilor din România” solicită membrilor Consiliului Superior al Magistraturii să respecte rolul constituţional al acestui organism reprezentativ al corpului magistraților, de garant al independenţei justiţiei
- 17.01.2017 – Asociaţia “Forumul Judecătorilor din România” pune la dispoziția persoanelor interesate un WHITE PAPER privitor la „Suprapopularea carcerală. Inoportunitatea amnistiei sau graţierii”
- 24.01.2017 – The Romanian Judges’ Forum Association – Observations regarding the projects of Emergency Government Ordinances concerning the collective pardon and the amendments of the Criminal Code and the Procedural Criminal Code
- 21.09.2016 – Asociaţia Forumul Judecătorilor din România a luat act de votul prin care Senatul României a respins solicitarea DNA de începere a urmăririi penale faţă de fostul viceprim-ministru, Gabriel Oprea, în privința decesului polițistului Bogdan Gigină
- 20.09.2017 – Forumul Judecătorilor din România: Numeroase adunări generale ale judecătorilor și procurorilor resping modificările de esență propuse de Ministrul Justiției privind legile justiției
- 27.09.2016 – Către Ministrul Justiției – modificare procedura promovare
- 22.07.2016 – The Romanian Judges’ Forum Association expresses its deepest concerns over the current situation in Turkey, regarding the Judiciary
- 13.06.2016 – Punct de vedere cu privire la Propunerea legislativă nr. PL-x 555/2015 privind modificarea Legii nr. 51/1995 pentru organizarea și exercitarea profesiei de avocat
- 31.05.2016 – Asociaţia “Forumul Judecătorilor din România” își manifestă susținerea în situația judecătorului Domnica Manole, din cadrul Curţii de Apel Chişinău
- White Paper – Necesitatea eliminării din legislație a categoriei personalului de specialitate juridică asimilat judecătorilor şi procurorilor
- 03.08.2015 Romanian Magistrates Protest Memorandum
- 14.08.2015 Memoriu protest modificare legi justitie
- 30.09.2015 Memoriu privind proiectul Legii de salarizare a personalului plătit din fonduri publice
- 23.08.2016 Memoriu aplicarea nediscriminatorie a OUG nr.20-2016
- 30.08.2017 FJR către adunările generale de la instante si parchete – critici modificari propuse de MJ legi justitie
- 30.08.2017 FJR Memoriu catre MJ propuneri modificare legi justitie din 23.08.2017
- 27.06.2017 FJR: Judecatorii Curtii Constitutionale trebuie sa aiba dreptul neingrădit de a formula opinii separate si concurente
- 03.05.2018 PRESS RELEASE – Romanian Judges Forum Association regarding amendments proposed to Criminal and Criminal Procedure Code
- 03.05.2018 Forumul Judecatorilor din Romania: Instantele judecatoresti si parchetele resping modificarile esentiale din proiectele depuse la Camera Deputatilor privind Codul penal, Codul de procedura penala si Codul de procedura civila
- 03.05.2018 Forumul Judecatorilor din Romania: Scrisoare catre membrii alesi ai Consiliului Superior al Magistraturii in legatura cu modificarile esentiale din proiectele depuse la Camera Deputatilor privind Codul penal, Codul de procedura penala si Codul de procedura civila
- 06.01.2017 – Nu restaurației cu iz penal! Apel pentru o putere judecătorească independentă
- White Paper – Diurnele încasate în sistemul judiciar. Necesitate sau risipă bugetară?
- Statut şi Act constitutiv
- Evenimente
- Cerere de adeziune
- Comunicate
Cuprins lb. engleză
INTERVIEWS – About Justice and Judges
Interviews with Mr. Bogdan Murgescu and Mr. Bedros Horasangian
ATTITUDES
Dieter Schlafen – Observations on the Unification of Jurisprudence, as it was Designed in Little Reform and the New Procedure Codes. The Impact of Four New Codes of Legal Certainty and Predictability of Justice.
Sarah M. R. Cravens – Judging Discretion: Contexts for Understanding the Role of Judgment
David F. Levi – From Judge to Dean: Reflections on the Bench and the Academy
Lydia Vicente – The Duty to Investigate Past Crimes and to Ensure the Rights of Victims of Forced Disappearances during the Civil War and Franco’s Regime.
Tomasz Posluszny – Mediation in Polish Legal System
Lee Epstein, William M. Landes and Richard A. Posner – Why (and When) Judges Dissent: a Theoretical and Empirical Analysis
Jaime Octávio Cardona Ferreira – Citizens and the Ways to Achieve Justice
Dragos Calin – Observations on the Spanish Judiciary in Social Matters
JURIDICAL STUDIES
Carla Alexandra Anghelescu – The right to Request and Obtain the Hearing of the Witnesses as a Procedural Safeguard of the Right to a Fair Trial
Delia-Narcisa Theohari, Camelia-Maria Ilie – Transfer of Litigiousness Debts
Sanda Lungu, Ion Ninu, Dragos Marian Radulescu, Gabriela Raducan – Point of View Formulated on Using ADR as a Means to Resolve Disputes Arising from Transactions and Business Practices in the European Union
CASE-LAW
Recent jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
1. The provisions of Law no. 10/2001 in relation to the provisions of common law – admissibility decision in the case Gladkvist and Bucur against Romania, March 2, 2010.
2. The controversy of applicability of art. 6 ECHR in relation to traffic contraventions settled in the decision of inadmissibility Pop against Romania.
Recent jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union
1. Free movement of persons. Tax exemption to purchase a first home. Indirect discrimination. Direct discrimination.
2. The principle of equal treatment between men and women. Using the criterion of sex as a factor in calculating premiums and benefits in insurance services.
3. Rights conferred by European citizenship. Applying to a purely internal situation.
4. The law applicable to employment contracts with community element.
5. Freedom of establishment. Restrictive national treatment on the establishment of large shopping centers.
6. Free movement of persons. Recognition of diplomas of higher education. Mechanisms. Conditions.
7. Community trade mark. The effects of court decisions on the validity and counterfeiting of Community trade marks given in a Member State.
Recent Jurisprudence of the High Court of Cassation and Justice
1. Failure to meet legal requirements for application to promotion contest of judges to vacant executive positions. Matter of private international law is not compatible with the specialization administrative department and taxation, administrative law being a branch of public law.
2. The aim of the Association of Magistrates of Romania, to defend the professional interests of its members in relation with other subjects of law, promoting the dignity of the profession and ensuring the rights and professional status of judges, justifies the interest in challenging the appointment as president or vice president of the Superior Council of Magistracy.
3. Unlawfulness of psychological testing and psychological review of candidates admitted to the written test conducted after sustaining the admission to the National Institute of Magistracy.
4. The assimilation of assistant judges from the High Court of Cassation and Justice, as rank and salary of the appeals court judges, does not lead ope legis to acquiring professional degree of the Court of Appeals judge.
PRESENTATIONS
The Project JurisClasor CEDO (www.hotararicedo.ro)
FUNNY
Order of Kenton Circuit Court on Amicably Settlment. Metaforical Argumentation
Leave a Reply