- Revista Forumul Judecătorilor
- Redacţia
- Număr curent
- Numere anterioare
- Lectură online
- Principii de publicare
- Comenzi
- Forum
- Asociaţia FJR
- Comunicate
- 10.05.2016 – Asociaţia „Forumul Judecătorilor din România” solicită membrilor Consiliului Superior al Magistraturii să respecte rolul constituţional al acestui organism reprezentativ al corpului magistraților, de garant al independenţei justiţiei
- 17.01.2017 – Asociaţia “Forumul Judecătorilor din România” pune la dispoziția persoanelor interesate un WHITE PAPER privitor la „Suprapopularea carcerală. Inoportunitatea amnistiei sau graţierii”
- 24.01.2017 – The Romanian Judges’ Forum Association – Observations regarding the projects of Emergency Government Ordinances concerning the collective pardon and the amendments of the Criminal Code and the Procedural Criminal Code
- 21.09.2016 – Asociaţia Forumul Judecătorilor din România a luat act de votul prin care Senatul României a respins solicitarea DNA de începere a urmăririi penale faţă de fostul viceprim-ministru, Gabriel Oprea, în privința decesului polițistului Bogdan Gigină
- 20.09.2017 – Forumul Judecătorilor din România: Numeroase adunări generale ale judecătorilor și procurorilor resping modificările de esență propuse de Ministrul Justiției privind legile justiției
- 27.09.2016 – Către Ministrul Justiției – modificare procedura promovare
- 22.07.2016 – The Romanian Judges’ Forum Association expresses its deepest concerns over the current situation in Turkey, regarding the Judiciary
- 13.06.2016 – Punct de vedere cu privire la Propunerea legislativă nr. PL-x 555/2015 privind modificarea Legii nr. 51/1995 pentru organizarea și exercitarea profesiei de avocat
- 31.05.2016 – Asociaţia “Forumul Judecătorilor din România” își manifestă susținerea în situația judecătorului Domnica Manole, din cadrul Curţii de Apel Chişinău
- White Paper – Necesitatea eliminării din legislație a categoriei personalului de specialitate juridică asimilat judecătorilor şi procurorilor
- 03.08.2015 Romanian Magistrates Protest Memorandum
- 14.08.2015 Memoriu protest modificare legi justitie
- 30.09.2015 Memoriu privind proiectul Legii de salarizare a personalului plătit din fonduri publice
- 23.08.2016 Memoriu aplicarea nediscriminatorie a OUG nr.20-2016
- 30.08.2017 FJR către adunările generale de la instante si parchete – critici modificari propuse de MJ legi justitie
- 30.08.2017 FJR Memoriu catre MJ propuneri modificare legi justitie din 23.08.2017
- 27.06.2017 FJR: Judecatorii Curtii Constitutionale trebuie sa aiba dreptul neingrădit de a formula opinii separate si concurente
- 03.05.2018 PRESS RELEASE – Romanian Judges Forum Association regarding amendments proposed to Criminal and Criminal Procedure Code
- 03.05.2018 Forumul Judecatorilor din Romania: Instantele judecatoresti si parchetele resping modificarile esentiale din proiectele depuse la Camera Deputatilor privind Codul penal, Codul de procedura penala si Codul de procedura civila
- 03.05.2018 Forumul Judecatorilor din Romania: Scrisoare catre membrii alesi ai Consiliului Superior al Magistraturii in legatura cu modificarile esentiale din proiectele depuse la Camera Deputatilor privind Codul penal, Codul de procedura penala si Codul de procedura civila
- 06.01.2017 – Nu restaurației cu iz penal! Apel pentru o putere judecătorească independentă
- White Paper – Diurnele încasate în sistemul judiciar. Necesitate sau risipă bugetară?
- Statut şi Act constitutiv
- Evenimente
- Cerere de adeziune
- Comunicate
Cuprins lb. engleză
Contents
EDITORIAL
Alex Kozinski – The Dead Past
ATTITUDES
Joanna M. Shepherd – The Politics of Judicial Opposition [English article]
Maurits Barendrecht – Courts, Competition and Innovation [English article]
Michael S. King – Realising the Potential of Judging [English article]
Monroe H. Freedman – The Unconstitutionality of Electing State Judges [English article]
LEGAL STUDIES
Elena Rozalinova, Alexander Angelov, Ivan Georgiev – Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement of Provisional and Protective Measures (International Cooperation in Civil Matters) [English article]
Gabriel Caian, Roxana Maria Călin, Florin Mihăiţă – The decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Dumitru and others v. România. Presentation, analysis and effects
Sanda Elena Lungu, Mihaela Mărgineanu – Shortcomings and difficulties in the regulations on mediation
Roxana Maria Călin – Discussions about mediation law enforcement by courts. Critique of legal provisions
JURISPRUDENCE
Recent case law of the European Court of Human Rights:
1. Lack of jurisprudential conflict itself. Divergent solutions determined by how the courts have considered the circumstances of each case – inadmissibility decision in the case of Stana Neghea and others v. România (with note by Dragoş Călin)
2. The lack of a “deep and persistent” divergence of regarding national courts – inadmissibility decision in the case of Ioan Radu and others v. România (with note by Dragoş Călin)
3. Termination of employment for prolonged absence from work because of arrest – inadmissibility decision in the case of Teodor Octavian Tripon v. România (with note by Dragoş Călin)
4. The obligation to provide detention conditions compatible with human dignity. Unlawful arrest is only exceptionally determined by serious and apparent irregularities. Presumption of innocence – Case prosecutor’s statements in the press – the case of Păvălache v. România (with note by Cristina Bunea)
5. Law no. 221/2009. Compensation for moral damage concerning convictions of political and administrative measures assimilated. Inadmissibility decision in the case of Nastaca Dolca and others v. România (with note by Dragoş Călin)
Recent case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union:
1. The air carrier has the obligation to compensate passengers if they were denied boarding due to reorganization of their flight due to a strike at the airport occurred two days before
2. The fact that a citizen of the Union exercises the function of head of state is capable of justifying a restriction on the right of free movement based on international law
3. Charter of Fundamental Rights does not preclude the Commission to bring the Union’s behalf before a national court, an action for damages suffered by the Union as a result of an agreement or practice contrary to European Union law
4. Radically reduction of the retirement age of Hungarian judges constitute unjustified discrimination on grounds of age
5. The right to paid annual leave may be reduced in proportion to the reduction of working time agreed through a social plan
(selections by Anamaria Groza and Dragoş Călin)
Recent case law in the field of the judiciary and magistrates status:
1. Refusal of reinstatement as a judge. The requirement that the person should be medically fit
2. Dissolution of the vice president vacant position of the Rădăuţi Court by decision of the C.S.M section of judges. Lack of the proposal of the President of the Court of Appeal Suceava in this regard. Jurisdiction of the Ministry of Justice
3. Article I, section 1 of Decision no. 504/21.07.2011 delivered by the Plenum of C.S.M. The task of management college court to order the distribution of judges from one section to another, in those cases where changing of specialization is justified by an clearly and lasting imbalance between sections in terms of workload
4. Refusal to appoint a prosecutor as a judge. Lack of a thorough analysis of C.S.M Plenum. Taking appropriate action to fill vacancies, reported on the reasons and requirements of judiciary
5. Rejection of the Ministry of Justice request regarding the granting assent to modification of functions and personnel scheme of the Court of Piteşti and Court of Curtea de Argeş by transforming clerk positions with secondary education in graduate clerk positions. Merits
6. The rejection of the plea of illegality against the Order of the Minister of Justice no. 2964/C/22 November 2007, by which was submitted the usage of a space in the building of the National Institute of Magistracy to the Association of Magistrates in Romania
(selections by Paula-Andrada Coţovanu and Dragoş Călin)
PRESENTATIONS
Juridical book launching at the Gaudeamus International Fair, November 24, 2012
“Disease of the Third Power“ documentary
HAPPY REGISTRY
A U.S. Senator sued God under the accusation of “harmful activities and terrorist threats”, relying on passages from the Old Testament. Senator then gave assurances that he is not crazy and that the trial has a noble cause – the fight against a bill meant to limit lawsuits by people such as those listed in the application.
Leave a Reply